The casino game development company that engineers RNG-driven, certification-ready games.

We build games engineered to pass GLI certification, and we are precise about who does what. We are the B2B engineering partner: we build the random number generator, the math model, and the platform integrity to the GLI-11 and GLI-19 standards, and we prepare and own the submission to the accredited lab. The lab, such as GLI or iTech Labs, is the body that actually tests and issues the certificate, and the operator is the party that holds the gaming licence. So we do not say we are GLI-certified or that we hold a licence, because that would be inaccurate. What we do is engineer the title so that when it reaches the lab, it is built to pass. That is what shortens the path to a certified, launchable game.

The random number generator produces the unpredictable outcomes, and the math model turns them into game behavior. The math model sets symbol distribution, win frequency, paylines, the return-to-player band, which is commonly in the mid-to-high nineties for slots, and the volatility, which is how often and how large wins land. We implement a cryptographically secure or hardware random number generator and validate it against the statistical suites labs use, including NIST SP 800-22 and diehard, checking uniform distribution, unpredictability, and that the sequence does not cycle. The module is sealed and signed so tampering is detectable. We build this first, because the game logic and the certification both sit on top of it.

They solve the same trust problem in two different ways, and they are not interchangeable. A lab-certified random number generator is tested by an accredited third party, such as iTech Labs or GLI, which reviews the source and the output and certifies that it is statistically random, which is what regulated markets require. Provably-fair is a cryptographic approach common in crypto casinos: the server commits to a seed, the player contributes a seed, and a nonce and a hash let the player independently re-run and verify each outcome after the fact, without trusting the operator. We build both, and for some crypto platforms we build them together, so you get the regulated-market certification path and the on-platform verification a crypto audience expects.

We treat the jurisdiction matrix as an engineering requirement, and we are clear that we build to the standards rather than hold the licences. For the UK, we engineer outcomes to the Gambling Commission technical standards, including RTS 7, and structure the build so test-house testing can be reported to the Commission. For Malta, we build the supplied software to the MGA technical requirements behind a B2B Critical Gaming Supply licence that the supplier or operator holds. In the US there is no federal licence, so games are certified and audited state by state, with geolocation enforcement, on the New Jersey model. We map your target markets first and engineer the geofencing, the per-market certification, and the reporting each regulator expects.

It depends on the game type and the certification scope, so we give a defensible estimate after discovery. As a representative range, a single slot is commonly cited around USD 25,000 to 80,000 or more, and the concept-to-certified-launch cycle for a slot is typically about twelve to sixteen weeks, with table, live-dealer, and crypto titles varying from there. Our median to a working build is 90 days, which lines up with that cycle. On cost, Resourcifi's global delivery model typically lands about 70% below comparable onshore US studio rates, and you can hire casino game developers from our senior, in-house bench, named in writing before you sign, including dedicated RNG and math-model engineers. These ranges are representative, and certification and licensing fees are separate and belong to the lab and the operator.

We build them as core modules from the first sprint, because regulated operators must provide them as a licensing condition. That means deposit, loss, and session limits, reality-check notifications that prompt a player about time and spend, self-exclusion and cooling-off with the record retention regulators require, and behavioral monitoring that can flag at-risk patterns and trigger interventions. On the financial side we wire in KYC at registration and withdrawal, and anti-money-laundering transaction monitoring, with the audit trail an operator needs to satisfy its regulator. We treat these as part of the platform integrity, not an add-on, because a title that cannot demonstrate them does not get to launch in a regulated market.